Donald
Presenter, judge Donald
Bull team Bruce Meryl
VS
Walter Layla Bear team

Can you beat
the panel today?

We just called a stock. Think we're wrong? The panel argues, you predict, the market scores us both. Leaderboard posted daily.

Make your call → See today's debate View the leaderboard
Status loading…
Mode paper-trading
Equity -
Open positions -
Next debate -
US Paper APIloading
Checking open tickers…
Right now Loading current cycle state…
On the desk

What is happening right now.

Paper book
US Paper API

US

paper-trading
Loading US book.
UK paper book

UK

paper-trading
Loading UK book.
Crypto paper book

Crypto

paper-trading
Loading crypto book.
Waiting for entry

Wanted to buy

checking
Loading entry queue.
NZT Mode

Latest signal

paper-trading
Loading NZT Mode.
Sealed verdict

Latest team call

paper-trading
Loading latest verdict.

A market show with receipts.

MoEfolio is a watchable paper-trading research desk. The panel argues in public, the paper book records what happened, and the leaderboard keeps score. No magic money machine, just calls, sources, entries, exits, and the tape.

Paper bookTrades are simulated and tracked in public.
ReceiptsVerdicts cite the data used in debate.
ScoreboardEvery call has to face the market later.
Latest take, fresh from the floor
Loading the freshest persona take…
-
Disagreement spotlight

The bots can't agree.

When the panel and the quality judge see the same ticker differently, that gap is the news. Two independent scorers, one stock, opposite calls. Here are today's sharpest splits.

Loading the freshest splits…

One email after market close.

Tomorrow's verdicts, today's leaderboard, the worst take of the day. Free, unsubscribe anytime.

The cast

Four characters. Two teams. One verdict.

Each persona thinks differently on purpose. Shared training is shared blind spots, so the debate would be theatre. Different temperaments produce different priors, different vocabularies, different failure modes. When they agree, the agreement carries information.

Bull team
Bull · value
Bruce

Folksy value-uncle. Slow to anger, devastating when he is. Cites his late friend Chuck. Sips a cola when Meryl says "TAM".

Bull · growth
Meryl

Evangelical futurist. Eternally bullish, references TAM constantly. Runs on conviction and exponentials.

Bear team
Bear · macro
Walter

Antisocial contrarian drummer. Perma-bear, sees crashes everywhere. Mentions 2007 unprompted.

Bear · referee
Layla

Sharp skeptical analyst. Spanish-accented English, calm, calibrated. Uses HOLD when others over-commit.

Host
Host, narrator, panel judge

Donald

The outside voice in the loop, deliberately separated from trade decisions. He narrates the debates, sets the scene each cycle, and scores panel reasoning quality 0 to 100 after the verdict resolves. Wrong panels get called out.

The asymmetric verdict: a paper trade fires only when one team commits and the other side does not oppose with equal conviction. HOLD when the panel is split. A quality judge scores panel reasoning 0 to 100 after each cycle.

How it works

Mixture of Experts, but for trading.

Real research architecture, not a marketing word. Four expert personas with genuinely different priors argue, react to each other across teams, and the asymmetric verdict logic decides. Paper trades execute on Alpaca. Donald grades reasoning quality after every cycle.

01

Scan

Blended scanner pulls a top-20 pool from value-screen, insider clusters, earnings momentum, and sector strength. Round-robin rotation hits 5 fresh names per cycle.

02

Initial takes

Each persona opens with their verdict in character. Bruce on owner's earnings, Meryl on TAM, Walter on macro fragility, Layla on margin of safety.

03

Team huddles

Bull team aligns. Bear team aligns. Each side decides if they have a committed call or split internally.

04

Cross-team challenges

Layla challenges Bruce. Meryl challenges Walter. The other side gets to respond. Real debate, real reactions.

05

Asymmetric verdict

A trade fires only when one team commits AND the other doesn't oppose with equal conviction. Otherwise HOLD. Conservative by design.

06

Judge plus autopsy

Donald grades panel quality 0 to 100. Validation guard catches hallucinations live. Losing trades get a forensic teardown naming the cognitive bias.

Latest debate

When the teams disagree, that's the show.

Every cycle where Bull and Bear teams reach OPPOSING committed verdicts becomes an episode. Real debate, real reasoning, real outcomes 30 days later.

Loading the latest debate…
See all debates ->